Benchmark Extreme - Real Benchmarks. No Marketing Hype.

For 1440p gaming, the best value among the cards that reach 60 fps is the Radeon RX 9070 XT. In Tom's Hardware's Cyberpunk 2077 test at 1440p Ultra with no upscaling it averages 81.8 fps, and at its $599 launch price that is $7.32 per frame, the lowest of any card on the list that clears 60. The RX 9070 and RTX 5070 follow at $7.47 and $7.92 per frame. Here is the whole ranking, and where the method can mislead.

One test, one lab, one testbed. Every figure below is an average in Cyberpunk 2077 at 1440p Ultra, native resolution with no upscaling or frame generation, from Tom's Hardware's 2026 GPU testbed (a Ryzen 7 9800X3D with 32GB of DDR5-6000). The RTX 50 cards were read from its GPU hierarchy chart on 24 June 2026, and the Radeon cards from its RX 9070 GRE review of 2 June. Price per frame is the launch price divided by that average, the same sum our graphics card table does when a card has no live price.

NVIDIA's GeForce RTX 5070 and AMD's Radeon RX 9070 launched a day apart in March 2025 at the same $549, and nineteen months later they still sit at the same price. On the numbers Tom's Hardware has published on its 2026 testbed, the RX 9070 is faster in all five 1440p games we have for both without ray tracing, by 6 to 18 percent. The RTX 5070 wins with ray tracing on, and in anything that runs on CUDA.

Both cards were run by Tom's Hardware on its 2026 GPU testbed, a Ryzen 7 9800X3D with 32GB of DDR5-6000, native resolution and no upscaling. The RTX 5070 figures come from its GPU hierarchy chart, read on 24 June 2026. The RX 9070 figures come from its RX 9070 GRE review, dated 2 June 2026. Same hardware, three weeks apart, so a gap of a few percent is within what a driver update could move.

The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti comes in 8GB and 16GB versions, $379 and $429 at launch, and they are the same chip. In most games the published numbers say you cannot tell them apart. The difference is one setting, ray tracing, and one job, local AI, and both depend on memory. Whether $50 for the extra 8GB is worth it comes down to which of those you do.

Tom's Hardware ran both cards on its 2026 GPU testbed, native resolution, no upscaling, and read on 24 June 2026. In Cyberpunk 2077 at 1080p Ultra the cards score 86.7 fps (8GB) and 86.5 (16GB). At 1440p Ultra it is 50.1 and 51.1, and at 4K Ultra 20.8 and 22.5. Alan Wake 2 at 1440p Ultra gives 38.5 and 39.8. Black Myth: Wukong at 1440p Very High gives 38.6 and 39.2. Counter-Strike 2 at 1440p High gives 255.3 and 254.9. Fortnite at 1440p High with Lumen and Nanite gives 72.8 and 75.8. None of those gaps is larger than about 8 percent, and most are within 4.

The Mac mini M6 is between 23 percent and four and a half times faster than the M4 model it replaces, depending on what you ask of it, and it lists at $899 against the M4's $599 launch price. That $300 is the whole question. Apple announced the M6 and M5 Pro minis on 25 August 2026, and the reviews are in, so here is what the published numbers say the extra money buys.

The M6 has a 12-core CPU, built from 2 super, 4 performance and 6 efficiency cores, and a 12-core GPU. The M4 has 10 CPU cores and a 10-core GPU. Memory bandwidth rises from 120GB/s to 153GB/s on the 16GB base model, per Apple's specifications. Both start at 16GB and 256GB of storage and both stop at 32GB of memory, so the ceiling for a big local AI model has not moved. The ports and the 155W power rating are the same on paper, except that the M6 has 2.5Gb Ethernet where the M4 has Gigabit.

A Mac can give its GPU only part of its memory, so the number on the box is not the number a model gets. By the rule macOS uses, a 16GB Mac offers the GPU about 10.7GB, a 32GB Mac about 21.3GB, and a 64GB Mac 48GB. That, plus a safety margin of 1 to 2GB, decides which open models run at full speed. For an 8B model, 16GB is enough. For a 32B model, you want 36GB. For a 70B model at 4-bit, 64GB is the least that works.

Inspect the filters every two weeks for the first month after a build, then set your interval from what you see. Most homes end up between one week and four months, and pets, carpet and smoke push you toward the short end. The calendar only gives you a starting guess. The filter itself tells you when it needs cleaning: if light no longer comes through the mesh, you are already late.

A full pass takes about 15 minutes of work. Drying adds anything from 10 minutes to several hours, depending on the filter material.

The 2L-ILM on Intel's LGA1954 socket is the clamp that presses the CPU onto its pins, now with two levers instead of one. It is a separate piece of hardware from the four holes your cooler bolts through. That separation is the whole compatibility question for Nova Lake-S. The new socket forces a new motherboard and a new CPU. Whether it forces a new cooler depends on the bolt pattern and on the surface the cold plate sits on, and so far the bolt pattern has not moved.

Intel's own confirmation of the socket was accidental. It came through an engineering validation tool listed on the company's website, which ties LGA1954 to Nova Lake-S, as TechPowerUp reported. The same report puts launch around Q1 2027, which is later than the second-half-2026 window earlier coverage pointed to. None of the sources cited here include a core count or a minimum retention-force spec from Intel, so neither figure appears below.

A case has good airflow when cool air reaches the GPU and CPU intakes with little resistance on the way in, and the product page usually tells you less about that than its fan count suggests.

The stakes are measurable. Newegg Insider's mid-tower roundup, updated October 7, puts the mesh-versus-glass gap at 3 to 8°C on the GPU under sustained load. It also says poor airflow costs 10 to 15°C at the CPU and 5 to 10°C at the GPU, and 5 to 10 fps in long sessions once throttling starts. Other outlets report 5 to 10°C and 8 to 15°C for the same mesh-versus-glass comparison. Those numbers disagree because "mesh" and "glass" each cover a wide range of panels, and that range is what the checks below are for.